Net Neutrality Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Net Neutrality - Essay ExampleHow, What, Impossible, m each would say, when they know that today internet providers have the capability of compulsive what everyone goes through, does and believes in for the purpose of getting profit i.e., violate network neutrality. Discussion Internet is at war as one of its basic structural principles is threatened. telecommunication companies are pressuring major political institutions to intervene and modify neutrality. Users and native internet companies are defending tooth and nail. The debate is open, but the reality is that most people affect by the violation of this principle know its meaning and implications (wiseGEEK, 2003). Companies and Net Neutrality The net neutrality means that bits are not discriminated, and there is no such(prenominal) thing as first or second class for such categories as destination, source, protocol or circumscribe. From this definition it follows that any company that provides internet go (ISPs) can manipulat e, manage, hinder or prevent user access to some Internet services according to their specific interests. Telecommunication companies control access and take network information. Undoubtedly, Internet service providers are identified as the main threat. Operators have proposed prioritizing some services over others, and some even speak of the remuneration of tolls and quotas to companies that fill the web content. According to a research it is clear that The telecom operators want to do much more business with internet by change magnitude the charges for access as well as monetizing the content that others want to view as if it was their own network. Another goal of the ISP would limit services (such as IP telephony or video conferencing) within their networks and extract revenues from people who earn a lot of bullion on the Web, like Google. (Quora, 2010) They provide the data pipes ensuring that any person at a price can connect and access all network resources. Currently, the se entities hold true to a code of honor that prevents them from taking control of the content by these ways. This code means net neutrality all content and services distributed through the pipes must be treated equally, regardless of person or entity (Quora, 2010). Neutrality still seems intact, but many users report behaviors of operators that already violate this basic principle of the network and most of the information highway studies confirm the soil war of the companies providing internet against p2p networks. But network neutrality is not limited to a dispute over the division of the economic pie concerning technology or the scrap against piracy but it is a concept that has entered the political game. According to some studies, the ISPs will accompany some European governments, in matters concerning the net transfer of gold to the other side of the Atlantic in areas such as digital advertising. Perhaps for this reason, politicians have not been clear. There is no communit y legislation regarding mesh topology Neutrality (Quora, 2010). The problem is that this policy is not neutrally supported by any law or regulated by any relevant entity. Therefore, their survival depends on common sense of users and, primarily, the network providers. The latter is the source of danger as the common sense of the big companies is generally shaped by the opportunities to make money and it cant be ruled out at some point that they may take control of internet